Saturday, January 5, 2002
Somewhere out there, the Oregon Duck is squawking louder than he has ever squawked before.
After watching Miami feed Nebraska its lunch in Thursday’s Rose Bowl, the entire Duck nation is quacking up a storm about what might have been.
If it weren’t for the failed Bowl Championship Series — a bogus ranking system that fell flat on its face once again this year — would UO fans really be chanting, “We’re No. 2”?
Guess we’ll never know.
And that’s what’s so galling about this current BCS system. It’s so subjective.
Margin of victory is given more value than quality wins, so if a team like Nebraska stacks up huge victories against pansies like Rice and Troy State, they are rewarded more than Oregon is for beating ranked opponents like Wisconsin, UCLA and Washington State.
Following BCS logic, had the Ducks scored one more touchdown versus Utah State or Cal, that may have been the needed boost to vault them into the national title game. How is that fair?
As far as I’m concerned, a win is a win no matter how you earn it. Whether you win by 50 or by five; whether the opponent is 10-0 or 0-10; a “W” is a “W.” Period.
If the BCS is going to factor margin of victory into its rankings, it might as well start considering margin of defeat. In that case, the Huskers shouldn’t have been anywhere near Pasadena after their embarrassing 62-36 loss to the Buffaloes on Nov. 23.
Not only that, but Nebraska’s loss came in the last game of the season — a time when teams should have figured out enough about themselves to avoid a 26-point loss.
The Ducks’ only defeat was by seven points to another nationally ranked opponent, Stanford, and it came in the seventh week of the season.
If the BCS considered margin of defeat and time of year in which a loss occurred, there would have been no debate over who the Hurricanes’ opponent should have been on Thursday.
Nebraska fans may try to use the “strength of schedule” argument, but if they choose to play that card, they would be hard-pressed to find a tougher conference schedule than Oregon’s — a bye versus the UW notwithstanding.
Sure the Huskers are in the same conference as Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas, but they lost handily to the Buffaloes, beat the Sooners by 10, and didn’t even play the Longhorns.
As for the other team at the heart of this debate (or, at least until Tuesday night): Colorado tried to argue that a win over then-No. 2-ranked Nebraska secured them a right to play for the national title. But the Buffs lost twice.
We’re talking about teams who end the season on an even plane — like Oregon and Nebraska — and have no way of proving which is the more deserving team except for to rely on an unproven, highly subjective point system.
Did the 1997 national champion Arizona Wildcats basketball team — a No. 4 seed in the tournament — have to consider a “point system” to get them into the championship game?
Of course not. And that’s precisely the point. In every other pro, college and high-school sport, each team that qualifies is allowed to compete on an even playing field at season’s end.
If all the other sports can employ a bracket system that works, why not college football?
There has never been a more convincing argument for a college football playoff than this season just passed. Give every team a shot that has earned a shot and let them prove it on the field — say, the top 16 teams.
In that case, this year’s tournament would have included my favorite underdogs, the No. 13-ranked WSU Cougars. Who’s to say that the Palouse Posse wouldn’t have gotten its revenge on the Ducks a second time around? Who knows if Florida or Texas would have gotten hot and made a late run toward the national title.
And who’s to say the Ducks wouldn’t have burst the Hurricanes’ bubble in the title game?
Guess we’ll never know.
More like this story
- Dams scoping meeting in The Dalles Tuesday
- HR County announces forest road closures
- BB gun vandalism
- Hood River Warming Shelter: Six sites provide warm place, meals
- Regional Red Cross reached out to 137 incidents this fall
- Church News: Churches announce holiday schedules
- Sports briefs for Dec. 3
- Hood River Lions Club announces local Peace Poster finalists
- Letters to the Editor for Dec. 3
- Pear-fection; Hardy Myers
Parkdale third graders sing "12 Disaster Days of Christmas"
Welcome to your sing-able Christmas gift list. What follows is an emergency rendition of “12 Days of Christmas” – for outfitting your home or car in case of snow storm, earthquake, flood or other emergency. Read it as a simple list, or sing it to the tune of “12 Days” – you know, as in “ … and a partridge in a pear tree…” Not to make light of it, but the song is a familiar framework for a set of gift ideas that you could consider gathering together, even if the recipient already owns items such as a bunch of coats, tire chains and flashlights. Stores throughout the Gorge are stocked up on all these items. Buying all 12 days might be prohibitive, but here are three ideas for checking any of the dozen off your list (notations follow, 1-12.) The gift items needed to stay warm, dry and safe are also coded to suggest items in your abode (A) in your car (C) or both (B). 12 Gallons of Water (A) 11 Family meals (B) 10 Cans of propane (A) 9 Hygiene bags (B) 8 Packs of batteries (A) 7 Spare coats (B) 6 Bright red flares (C) 5 Cozy blankets (B) 4 Tire chains (C) 3 Flashlights (B) 2 cell phone chargers (B) 1 And a crush-proof first aid kit (B) Price ranges? Here’s a few quotes for days Three, Two, Four and Nine: n A family gift of flashlights (three will run $15-30, Hood River Supply, Tum-A-Lum) n Cell phone chargers (two will run $30-60) n Tire chains (basic set, $30, Les Schwab, returnable if unused for the winter) n Family meals ($100 or so should cover the basics for three or four reasonably well-fed days) n The home kit should be kept in a handy place near an exit, and remember that water needs to be replenished every few months. If you have a solid first aid kit already, switch out the gift idea with “and-a-sto-o-u-t- tub-for it-all …” Otherwise, it’s a case of assembling your home or car kits and making sure all members of the family know what the resources are and how to use them (ie flares and propane). Emergency situations are at worst life-threatening, at best deeply uncomfortable if you and your family are left without power for an extended period, or traveling and find yourself in a situation where you need to wait out a storm, lengthy traffic delay, or other crisis. Notes on the 12 gift ideas: 12 – Gallons of water: that’s one per person in a four-member family to last for three days, the recommended minimum to be prepared for utility outages. 11 – Easy-open packaged goods, energy bars, dried food and nuts are good things to include for nutrition. Think of what your family of four needs for three days to stay fortified and hydrated (see number 12). Can-opener also recommended 10 – If you have a propane camping stove, keep extra fuel handy. 9 – Hygiene bags: put packaged moistened towelettes, toilet paper, and plastic ties in large garbage bags (for personal sanitation) Resource list courtesy of Hood River County Emergency Management, Barbara Ayers, manager/ 541-386-1213. The county also reminds residents to Get a Kit, Make A Plan to connect your family if separated, and Stay Informed. See www.co.hood-river.or.us to opt-in for citizen alerts. Enlarge