Tuesday, October 15, 2002
In one phrase, Hood River resident Susan Crowley summed up the strong passions that have divided discussions over the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act for the past 16 years.
“This is almost a religious conflict,” Crowley told an Oregon legislative panel at a special hearing on Monday to review the role and operations of the Gorge Commission.
She praised the passage of the 1986 federal law that protected the “national treasure” and called for the state officials to end the “gotcha” game against the Commission that created an “administrative quagmire.”
“We hog tie them by denying adequate funding then wait for them to make mistakes when their resources are limited and then say ’gotcha,’” said Crowley.
She joined other members of Friends of the Columbia Gorge and Scenic Act supporters in the call for more funding of the Commission.
These requests were made both verbally and in written testimony to the Subcommittee on Columbia River Gorge Commission Review that was co-chaired by Sen. Ted Ferrioli, R-John Day, and Rep Patti Smith, R-Corbett.
“Many of the controversies about the Gorge Commission can be traced to limited capabilities and efforts that reflect limited funding from the Oregon and Washington Legislatures,” read Mosier resident Gay Jervey from a written statement prepared by Ken Maddox of Hood River.
However, Hood River resident Rita Swyers submitted results of a Scenic Area survey that showed 218 property owners believed they had been “victimized” by heavy-handed bureaucracy.
“My heart is breaking over what is happening to residents of the Gorge,” said Swyers, who worked with representatives from two Gorge private property rights watchdog groups to collect the findings.
The stories she recounted included the expensive legal battle faced by many landowners to build a home, inconsistencies in the administration of regulations and downzoning of property that left the mortage holder with no value or use.
“It is possible to preserve the beauty of the Gorge and protect the Constitutional rights of residents,” Swyers told the state officials.
These “horror” stories were backed up by testimony from other landowners on both sides of the Columbia River who said they had been adversely affected — and even from supporters of the NSA such as Hood River’s Jeff Hunter.
Hunter, a realtor, said that although the “vast majority” of Scenic Area development applications were approved, he had experience with two cases that called for some reform.
“I offer these examples to allow us to fine tune implementation to strike a balance between individual property rights on the one hand and our responsibility as stewards of this treasure to pass it on intact to the next generation,” said Hunter.
His examples included two Mosier properties, one that left the owner with lost valuation because any new home had to be sited in a “depression” to avoid visibility and the second that forced the owner to spend more than three years and about $25,000 in legal fees to fight a development challenge.
He recommended that siting guidelines be revised to a “reasonable standard” so homeowners could enjoy some view of the Gorge and the appeals process be shortened for contested decisions.
Ferrioli agreed that steps needed to be taken to eliminate the lengthy appeals process, possibly by establishing a formal arbitration or mediation process. He questioned whether the Gorge Commission was the correct body to hear appeals of its own decisions, a methodology that was not practiced by any other state agency.
“The goal is not to eliminate the right of appeal but to consolidate the causes,” said Ferrioli, who also favored establishment of both citizen and tribal advisory committees.
“Their (Commission) job is huge and there’s so many interests that have to be balanced, perhaps we’re asking too much of the Commission alone,” Ferrioli said.
In a rare moment of unity, both proponents and opponents of the Scenic Act agreed that the land acquisition program overseen by the U.S. Forest Service needed to be reviewed for changes.
Several Gorge residents said the program to purchase heavily regulated Special Management Area lands appeared to be unevenly applied, with similar properties valued as high as $75,000 per acre to as low as $4,000. Norm Haight, a Skamania County, Wash., landowner, said added emphases needed to be given toward the purchase of General Management Area properties since many of these parcels were also severely restricted for use.
Ferrioli asked to see the paperwork in the case of Klickitat County resident Gene Witham who had spent 16 years attempting to negotiate a purchase of his non-developable parcel.
Rep. Chris Beck, D-Portland, a member of the panel, termed the Scenic land acquisition process as “funky” and said a greater effort needed to be given to target key properties for protection.
Although Hood River resident Christine Knowles heralded the Scenic Act for increasing tourism and other economic opportunities throughout the Gorge, Ferrioli pointed out previous testimoney that had shown the unemployment rates in both Hood River and Wasco Counties as the highest in the state. He also questioned whether the community of Hood River was becoming “exclusive” by not providing affordable housing for all income levels and forcing younger generations to move out of the area for employment. He called for an economic development study that would factor the effect of Scenic Area regulations into the financial picture.
Continued coverage of this topic will appear in the Oct. 19 edition, following the third and final hearing of the oversight panel.
More like this story
- Dams scoping meeting in The Dalles Tuesday
- HR County announces forest road closures
- BB gun vandalism
- Hood River Warming Shelter: Six sites provide warm place, meals
- Regional Red Cross reached out to 137 incidents this fall
- Church News: Churches announce holiday schedules
- Sports briefs for Dec. 3
- Hood River Lions Club announces local Peace Poster finalists
- Letters to the Editor for Dec. 3
- Pear-fection; Hardy Myers
Parkdale third graders sing "12 Disaster Days of Christmas"
Welcome to your sing-able Christmas gift list. What follows is an emergency rendition of “12 Days of Christmas” – for outfitting your home or car in case of snow storm, earthquake, flood or other emergency. Read it as a simple list, or sing it to the tune of “12 Days” – you know, as in “ … and a partridge in a pear tree…” Not to make light of it, but the song is a familiar framework for a set of gift ideas that you could consider gathering together, even if the recipient already owns items such as a bunch of coats, tire chains and flashlights. Stores throughout the Gorge are stocked up on all these items. Buying all 12 days might be prohibitive, but here are three ideas for checking any of the dozen off your list (notations follow, 1-12.) The gift items needed to stay warm, dry and safe are also coded to suggest items in your abode (A) in your car (C) or both (B). 12 Gallons of Water (A) 11 Family meals (B) 10 Cans of propane (A) 9 Hygiene bags (B) 8 Packs of batteries (A) 7 Spare coats (B) 6 Bright red flares (C) 5 Cozy blankets (B) 4 Tire chains (C) 3 Flashlights (B) 2 cell phone chargers (B) 1 And a crush-proof first aid kit (B) Price ranges? Here’s a few quotes for days Three, Two, Four and Nine: n A family gift of flashlights (three will run $15-30, Hood River Supply, Tum-A-Lum) n Cell phone chargers (two will run $30-60) n Tire chains (basic set, $30, Les Schwab, returnable if unused for the winter) n Family meals ($100 or so should cover the basics for three or four reasonably well-fed days) n The home kit should be kept in a handy place near an exit, and remember that water needs to be replenished every few months. If you have a solid first aid kit already, switch out the gift idea with “and-a-sto-o-u-t- tub-for it-all …” Otherwise, it’s a case of assembling your home or car kits and making sure all members of the family know what the resources are and how to use them (ie flares and propane). Emergency situations are at worst life-threatening, at best deeply uncomfortable if you and your family are left without power for an extended period, or traveling and find yourself in a situation where you need to wait out a storm, lengthy traffic delay, or other crisis. Notes on the 12 gift ideas: 12 – Gallons of water: that’s one per person in a four-member family to last for three days, the recommended minimum to be prepared for utility outages. 11 – Easy-open packaged goods, energy bars, dried food and nuts are good things to include for nutrition. Think of what your family of four needs for three days to stay fortified and hydrated (see number 12). Can-opener also recommended 10 – If you have a propane camping stove, keep extra fuel handy. 9 – Hygiene bags: put packaged moistened towelettes, toilet paper, and plastic ties in large garbage bags (for personal sanitation) Resource list courtesy of Hood River County Emergency Management, Barbara Ayers, manager/ 541-386-1213. The county also reminds residents to Get a Kit, Make A Plan to connect your family if separated, and Stay Informed. See www.co.hood-river.or.us to opt-in for citizen alerts. Enlarge