Wednesday, April 4, 2012
I am sitting in the testing lab in the spring of 2012 with my Freshman English class, one of five that I teach.
All week (three full class sessions), students have been reading passages and multiple-choice questions. This is one of three such tests they will take this year and every year in reading, writing and math. With the imposition of Core Curriculum Standards, they will take many more tests in multiple subject areas.
Education has become a numbers game. The use of statistical and web-based testing software to measure educational outcomes, progress and proficiency is established. The goal is for teachers, students and schools to be evaluated and ranked based on these test outcomes.
Tests have become the only measure that really matters for high-stakes educational decisions. Graduation from high school, placement in test prep classes, school funding and job security are increasingly based on multiple-choice tests. More and more resources are allocated for this purpose.
The new education gurus are statisticians, software developers, test designers, curriculum developers and technocrats. They tell us what to teach, when to teach it and by default, how to teach. All decisions are based on data, because that is measurable.
Educational progress now largely depends on what can be counted. This is the corporate business model that has been established for public education. Private schools for the privileged, and charter schools, are largely left untouched by testing mandates.
For public schools, a new generation of tests is being developed to poke and prod students into achievement. The costs, benefits, risks and consequences are approved by our educational and political elites. The buzzwords of top-down education reform are worth examining.
"Accountability" means punitive consequences for administrators, teachers, students and schools that don't make sufficient statistical gains. "Measurable" means replacing human judgment with mechanical and digital thumbs-up or thumbs-down assessment. "Achievement" means reducing the social and personal challenges of human beings into a multiple test format.
In 2000, Sen. Paul Wellstone delivered a speech to the Teacher's College at Columbia University. He said, "The abuse of tests for high-stakes purposes has subverted the benefits tests can bring. Using a single standardized test as the sole determinant for graduation, promotion, tracking and ability grouping is not fair and has not fostered greater equality or opportunity for students."
In 2012, that is exactly what we are doing to students in public education, except that instead of a single standardized test we have a "battery" of such tests.
Not all testing is bad. Some is useful and important. We can gain important information about students and teaching from tests. My concern is the abuse of tests, when high-stakes educational decisions are based on a test score.
The new generation of web-based adaptive tests has many proponents, but they are not my students. Likely, they are not people who spend their day in a classroom. Probably, they are not the parents of students learning English or the parents of students with disabilities.
The impact of these tests goes unnoticed by the parents of the most privileged students because the tests cause barely a ripple in their future plans.
College-bound students are not the victims of the tests. Students who have had access to healthy food, books, healthcare, summer vacations, tutors, conversations with adults, an extensive wardrobe, support for homework, ballet lessons and lacrosse clubs are not the casualties of testing. It is the students who are most at-risk and most challenged who are the collateral damage of testing.
Other casualties of testing are teacher-made curriculum, elective classes, challenging inquiry-based classes for all students, art, music, field trips, recess, academic freedom and local decision-making. Welcome to the test ghetto, where segregation and test abuse are the norm.
This is not the "soft bigotry of low expectations" that the No Child Left Behind law was supposed to erase. This is the hard bigotry of the test ghetto, where students who don't pass tests are denied the rights and benefits of a humane and human education.
Mark S. Reynolds teaches at Hood River Valley High School.
More like this story
- CGCC holds job fair Saturday
- ‘The Secrets of Master Brewers’ book and beer discussion Thursday
- Yesteryears: Odell’s ‘long-looked-for and much wished-for waterworks system’ under construction in 1927
- ‘Reads’ kicks off
- Seed Share
- Columbia Gorge Cat Rescue offers thanks
- Abby Walker wins ‘Good Citizens’ scholarship from DAR
- YoHOHs volunteers spread joy to hospice patients
- HRVHS grad Luke MacMillan sings in Bard College song series
- Sense Of Honor: ‘They were people who stuck out their necks to help Japanese-Americans’
Parkdale third graders sing "12 Disaster Days of Christmas"
Welcome to your sing-able Christmas gift list. What follows is an emergency rendition of “12 Days of Christmas” – for outfitting your home or car in case of snow storm, earthquake, flood or other emergency. Read it as a simple list, or sing it to the tune of “12 Days” – you know, as in “ … and a partridge in a pear tree…” Not to make light of it, but the song is a familiar framework for a set of gift ideas that you could consider gathering together, even if the recipient already owns items such as a bunch of coats, tire chains and flashlights. Stores throughout the Gorge are stocked up on all these items. Buying all 12 days might be prohibitive, but here are three ideas for checking any of the dozen off your list (notations follow, 1-12.) The gift items needed to stay warm, dry and safe are also coded to suggest items in your abode (A) in your car (C) or both (B). 12 Gallons of Water (A) 11 Family meals (B) 10 Cans of propane (A) 9 Hygiene bags (B) 8 Packs of batteries (A) 7 Spare coats (B) 6 Bright red flares (C) 5 Cozy blankets (B) 4 Tire chains (C) 3 Flashlights (B) 2 cell phone chargers (B) 1 And a crush-proof first aid kit (B) Price ranges? Here’s a few quotes for days Three, Two, Four and Nine: n A family gift of flashlights (three will run $15-30, Hood River Supply, Tum-A-Lum) n Cell phone chargers (two will run $30-60) n Tire chains (basic set, $30, Les Schwab, returnable if unused for the winter) n Family meals ($100 or so should cover the basics for three or four reasonably well-fed days) n The home kit should be kept in a handy place near an exit, and remember that water needs to be replenished every few months. If you have a solid first aid kit already, switch out the gift idea with “and-a-sto-o-u-t- tub-for it-all …” Otherwise, it’s a case of assembling your home or car kits and making sure all members of the family know what the resources are and how to use them (ie flares and propane). Emergency situations are at worst life-threatening, at best deeply uncomfortable if you and your family are left without power for an extended period, or traveling and find yourself in a situation where you need to wait out a storm, lengthy traffic delay, or other crisis. Notes on the 12 gift ideas: 12 – Gallons of water: that’s one per person in a four-member family to last for three days, the recommended minimum to be prepared for utility outages. 11 – Easy-open packaged goods, energy bars, dried food and nuts are good things to include for nutrition. Think of what your family of four needs for three days to stay fortified and hydrated (see number 12). Can-opener also recommended 10 – If you have a propane camping stove, keep extra fuel handy. 9 – Hygiene bags: put packaged moistened towelettes, toilet paper, and plastic ties in large garbage bags (for personal sanitation) Resource list courtesy of Hood River County Emergency Management, Barbara Ayers, manager/ 541-386-1213. The county also reminds residents to Get a Kit, Make A Plan to connect your family if separated, and Stay Informed. See www.co.hood-river.or.us to opt-in for citizen alerts. Enlarge