Tuesday, October 30, 2012
We have been having an ongoing conversation at the office about the seeming reduction of interpersonal communication skills among the younger generation. Younger generation is a fairly sweeping generalization since coworkers run the gamut from their 20s through 60s, but in general writing and speech skills seem to be declining in those we encounter. Most concerning is that speech and writing skills are integral to expression and communication of feelings and values.
Since our job is to assess the environmental conditions that may have factored into that decline, we began looking at what are the significant changes in this generation’s life compared to previous generations. Research led us to look at the explosion of information that young people are exposed to and their ever-increasing access to that information through technology.
We too wondered about this generation’s dependence on technology and its influence on their speaking, listening, writing and communication skills. How has technology shaped their desire for instant and broader access to everything and everyone? Is there a cost for this convenience?
Technology has given youth and adults instant access to family, friends, data bases, experts, professionals, celebrities and politicians. While technology has increased access to information, there are few filters that help you sort through that information and help determine what is factual, truthful or meaningful. Is the person’s Facebook profile even close to who they really are? Male or female? Young or old? Truthful or dishonest? Victim or predator?
Previous generations relied on interpersonal interactions and communication to determine whether a friend was reliable, honest or trustworthy. Has technology been a barrier to the development of communication skills as well as the enhancement touted by high-tech businesses? Do texting, acronyms and emoticons convey the nuances of feelings and values that are the basis of communication?
While the breadth of information is increasing incrementally, the depth and richness of communication seems to be decreasing. I have seen kids texting each other while riding in the same car, or sharing the same bus seat. Some seem alienated by face-to-face conversation. They appear more comfortable looking at the cellphone screen than another person’s face or looking through the lens of their cellphone camera, rather than at the interaction occurring right in front of them.
Eye contact, facial and body language often lose their impact when viewed through hardware. Over time people come to rely on the hardware rather than understanding what a person is trying to communicate.
Just try asking a cellphone aficionado to turn off their phone and remove it from their person so you can have a face-to-face conversation. Often they appear uncomfortable without the device.
As with any technology it is up to the users, kids, parents, schools, employers and legislators to set the standards for when and how they can be used to increase the positive and decrease the negative impact. New technological advances are so rapid they often make the standards obsolete before they are even in place. No cellphone conversations in the car; instant blue tooth. No texting; on-board computers that speak to you in the car. Schools had rules that said phone calls will be filtered through the school office and used for emergencies only.
Interrupting the student, teacher and classroom diminished the value of what was being taught in the classroom. As texting and instant messaging become the norm, parent and child alike demand use of the instrument for any and every thought, regardless of significance. “Pick up milk, Just used the bathroom.” Information overload, TMI.
That carries over into the workplace as well. Personal cellphones have decreased work productivity through increased interruptions, and the growing knee-jerk response that you check and reply to any and all calls instantly because anything said is important. You will respond 24/7. Kids keep their cellphones on all night, so they can instantly reply.
We set outside filters on technology to underscore what is valued. It appears that the older generation is the one out of step and no longer will be the ones setting the standards. We are the ones who must readjust our values to align with the younger generation. It is when those values seem contrary to that which has helped us succeed in life, long-term interpersonal relationships and the ability to communicate, that it is difficult to swallow.
I have had a love-hate relationship with technology. It has made me more efficient and effective. It has expanded my horizons. It has humbled me, baffled me and excited me. I have achieved a delicate balance of reaping the benefits without losing some of the values. We turn off the television, cellphones and computer at dinner and during family time.
We look our grandchildren in the eye, hold their hand or touch their shoulder when we want to communicate with them. They can see in our eyes tears of joy or sorrow, respond to the tone of our voice, the set of our shoulders and the warmth of our touch. My grandchildren are voracious readers, thanks to the Kindle. But who will write the books that will be read on the Kindle if writers aren’t able to communicate the depth of emotion through the written word?
I watched the memorial service of Robert Shu Yasui on Saturday, broadcast on a live web stream from the Methodist Church in Williamsport, Pa. It was the first family funeral that I attended via the Internet. I wasn’t sure how it would translate. Funerals are designed to help the living grieve, to share the impact of a person’s life on family and society. I was not able to travel across the country to join the family, so this was the next-best thing.
I could see them vividly, hear their stories and be moved by the words and music of Amazing Grace. I could hear the emotion in their voice and read their body language. I couldn’t put my arm around them to offer comfort but after watching, I could express my feelings in writing or verbally using technology.
Perhaps I could have communicated better with the grandchildren and great-grandchildren if I tweeted 143 (I Love You) and added an emoticon for emphasis using the language with which they are so familiar. I am not sure what the symbol for pride is on the computer or cellphone. But I am sure they can teach me.
More like this story
- Letters to the Editor for Feb. 22
- Honoring Loyalty: Oregon rightfully saves the date: Feb. 19: Our necessary ‘Day of Remembrance’
- Legislative Letter: Elliott Forest should have followed Hood River model
- 2017 INNOVATIVE TEACHING GRANTS: Education Foundation announces new funds
- CGCC master plan aims for ‘cost-effective’ degree route, service to Hispanics
- Speech-Debate team readies for busy spring
- ‘Green’ gainers
- CAT seeks feedback on plan improvements
- Hood River Library partners with Kickstand
- Tri-County Recycling announces collection events
Parkdale third graders sing "12 Disaster Days of Christmas"
Welcome to your sing-able Christmas gift list. What follows is an emergency rendition of “12 Days of Christmas” – for outfitting your home or car in case of snow storm, earthquake, flood or other emergency. Read it as a simple list, or sing it to the tune of “12 Days” – you know, as in “ … and a partridge in a pear tree…” Not to make light of it, but the song is a familiar framework for a set of gift ideas that you could consider gathering together, even if the recipient already owns items such as a bunch of coats, tire chains and flashlights. Stores throughout the Gorge are stocked up on all these items. Buying all 12 days might be prohibitive, but here are three ideas for checking any of the dozen off your list (notations follow, 1-12.) The gift items needed to stay warm, dry and safe are also coded to suggest items in your abode (A) in your car (C) or both (B). 12 Gallons of Water (A) 11 Family meals (B) 10 Cans of propane (A) 9 Hygiene bags (B) 8 Packs of batteries (A) 7 Spare coats (B) 6 Bright red flares (C) 5 Cozy blankets (B) 4 Tire chains (C) 3 Flashlights (B) 2 cell phone chargers (B) 1 And a crush-proof first aid kit (B) Price ranges? Here’s a few quotes for days Three, Two, Four and Nine: n A family gift of flashlights (three will run $15-30, Hood River Supply, Tum-A-Lum) n Cell phone chargers (two will run $30-60) n Tire chains (basic set, $30, Les Schwab, returnable if unused for the winter) n Family meals ($100 or so should cover the basics for three or four reasonably well-fed days) n The home kit should be kept in a handy place near an exit, and remember that water needs to be replenished every few months. If you have a solid first aid kit already, switch out the gift idea with “and-a-sto-o-u-t- tub-for it-all …” Otherwise, it’s a case of assembling your home or car kits and making sure all members of the family know what the resources are and how to use them (ie flares and propane). Emergency situations are at worst life-threatening, at best deeply uncomfortable if you and your family are left without power for an extended period, or traveling and find yourself in a situation where you need to wait out a storm, lengthy traffic delay, or other crisis. Notes on the 12 gift ideas: 12 – Gallons of water: that’s one per person in a four-member family to last for three days, the recommended minimum to be prepared for utility outages. 11 – Easy-open packaged goods, energy bars, dried food and nuts are good things to include for nutrition. Think of what your family of four needs for three days to stay fortified and hydrated (see number 12). Can-opener also recommended 10 – If you have a propane camping stove, keep extra fuel handy. 9 – Hygiene bags: put packaged moistened towelettes, toilet paper, and plastic ties in large garbage bags (for personal sanitation) Resource list courtesy of Hood River County Emergency Management, Barbara Ayers, manager/ 541-386-1213. The county also reminds residents to Get a Kit, Make A Plan to connect your family if separated, and Stay Informed. See www.co.hood-river.or.us to opt-in for citizen alerts. Enlarge