ANOTHER VOICE: Why would HR port give one tenant a ‘sweetheart’ deal?

A rendering of the space the proposed cable park would take up in the Nichols boat basin.

Port of Hood River Image
A rendering of the space the proposed cable park would take up in the Nichols boat basin.

Dear Port Commissioners:

I attended the public meeting on Sept. 12 at the Best Western Hotel and appreciate the opportunity to weigh in on your decision regarding the future of the Nichols Boat Basin.

Persuasive testimony suggested that under the Public Use (Floatage) Doctrine, the port cannot lease the property and restrict the public’s access to the waterway proposed for the cable park. Apparently, the developer’s attorney assumed the waterway was not in its natural state when he concluded that the law did not apply to Nichols Landing.

Susan Garrett Crowley presented historic photographs of the Hood River delta showing how the natural flow of the area has not changed in 100 years.

Other testimony of interest included anecdotal evidence of relative lease terms at the port pointing out that proposed terms fell far below market level. At the very least, the financial terms need more scrutiny to ensure that the public will get a fair market rate of compensation should the port allow the development.

Your website logo states “Providing for the region’s economic future.” I hope your decision will jibe with your mission statement. Even if the port had the authority to enter into an agreement here, we heard some contradictory statements about whether financial terms have been discussed between the parties. According to the port’s own website, it looks like discussions have taken place:

The above suggests that this horse has already left the barn, and it doesn’t look good for Joe Public. “Six hundred dollars per month for 15 years with options for 15 more” was the stated offer from Naito to the port.

President of the Port Jon Davies announced, “We have worked very hard to get to this point.” So, apparently it is end game; public scrutiny is a nicety, and yet Port Executive Director Mr. McElwee insisted that to date he has no idea what the lease compensation will entail.

This letter from December 2011 suggests that numbers have been discussed and they are beyond the idea stage. In any event, why would the port commission sell our public waterways for what amounts to 33 cents a person in Hood River County per year? As someone called out at your meeting, “That’s quite a discount.”

Under these circumstances it’s easy to believe the port is providing for the economic future of our elected County Commission Maui Meyer, who is partnered with the Naito family.

In essence, it is the port commissioner’s job to find business and development for the port, but when our elected officials have a personal stake in a project, all aspects of the process need to be transparent, especially the finances. This conflict of interest cannot be left undisclosed in a back-room deal, and parties should provide full public disclosure of the extent of their involvement.

As part of its responsibility to manage use of public lands in the best interest of the public, the port commission needs to set aside its personal relationships and come to fair market terms. If I were to rent the Basin it would cost me $750/day; that I assume is a “fair” rate. In any case, how can the public decide if a lease agreement is a good idea if the terms of such are left a “mystery”?

This is all the more galling to me because while the port is making sweetheart deals with elected officials, developers and corporations involving our public waterways, private property and the tourist industry for the little people (your constituents) have not fared as well.

Recently, Hood River County Planning Department is focusing its efforts on enforcement issues regarding rental properties, B&Bs, farm stands, wedding venues (essentially regulating them out of business) who compete for tourist business. The timing of such enforcement cannot go unnoticed and is suspicious at best. Who but a hotel developer stands to benefit from declaring illegal private house rentals outside the city limits?

It is this writer’s opinion that the port has an important mission, and it needs to refer back to its mission statement in regards to the future of the boat basin.


Nilsa Zeman lives in Parkdale.

Editor’s note: Maui Meyer’s affiliation with Naito Corp. is as leasing agent, and prospective restaurant tenant should the project go through.

Latest stories

Latest video:

Parkdale third graders sing "12 Disaster Days of Christmas"

Welcome to your sing-able Christmas gift list. What follows is an emergency rendition of “12 Days of Christmas” – for outfitting your home or car in case of snow storm, earthquake, flood or other emergency. Read it as a simple list, or sing it to the tune of “12 Days” – you know, as in “ … and a partridge in a pear tree…” Not to make light of it, but the song is a familiar framework for a set of gift ideas that you could consider gathering together, even if the recipient already owns items such as a bunch of coats, tire chains and flashlights. Stores throughout the Gorge are stocked up on all these items. Buying all 12 days might be prohibitive, but here are three ideas for checking any of the dozen off your list (notations follow, 1-12.) The gift items needed to stay warm, dry and safe are also coded to suggest items in your abode (A) in your car (C) or both (B). 12 Gallons of Water (A) 11 Family meals (B) 10 Cans of propane (A) 9 Hygiene bags (B) 8 Packs of batteries (A) 7 Spare coats (B) 6 Bright red flares (C) 5 Cozy blankets (B) 4 Tire chains (C) 3 Flashlights (B) 2 cell phone chargers (B) 1 And a crush-proof first aid kit (B) Price ranges? Here’s a few quotes for days Three, Two, Four and Nine: n A family gift of flashlights (three will run $15-30, Hood River Supply, Tum-A-Lum) n Cell phone chargers (two will run $30-60) n Tire chains (basic set, $30, Les Schwab, returnable if unused for the winter) n Family meals ($100 or so should cover the basics for three or four reasonably well-fed days) n The home kit should be kept in a handy place near an exit, and remember that water needs to be replenished every few months. If you have a solid first aid kit already, switch out the gift idea with “and-a-sto-o-u-t- tub-for it-all …” Otherwise, it’s a case of assembling your home or car kits and making sure all members of the family know what the resources are and how to use them (ie flares and propane). Emergency situations are at worst life-threatening, at best deeply uncomfortable if you and your family are left without power for an extended period, or traveling and find yourself in a situation where you need to wait out a storm, lengthy traffic delay, or other crisis. Notes on the 12 gift ideas: 12 – Gallons of water: that’s one per person in a four-member family to last for three days, the recommended minimum to be prepared for utility outages. 11 – Easy-open packaged goods, energy bars, dried food and nuts are good things to include for nutrition. Think of what your family of four needs for three days to stay fortified and hydrated (see number 12). Can-opener also recommended 10 – If you have a propane camping stove, keep extra fuel handy. 9 – Hygiene bags: put packaged moistened towelettes, toilet paper, and plastic ties in large garbage bags (for personal sanitation) Resource list courtesy of Hood River County Emergency Management, Barbara Ayers, manager/ 541-386-1213. The county also reminds residents to Get a Kit, Make A Plan to connect your family if separated, and Stay Informed. See to opt-in for citizen alerts. Enlarge


Nic says...

I'm embarrassed that the editors at HR News thought this piece deserved it's very own section. Especially the fact that the Editors note clarifies Maui Meyer's affiliation and relationships, but fails to disclose the authors.

I don't know Nilsa or her family and only have Google to tell me that she owns and operates a B&B in the valley and is actively fighting the county on a current issue pertaining to such business. It seems the HR News has had some interaction with Nilsa in the past and would be able to offer some insight in to her motives and bias so the reader is not mislead. That seems like the responsible thing to do considering the slander contained in this piece.

Also, I will have to assume there is some bad blood between her and Meyer, but like her article, I can only assume.

I think the HR News would do good to it's readers to clarify it's intent with this publishing and clarify the authors background and relationship to these issues.


Posted 3 October 2012, 9:52 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment

News from our Community Partners