‘No Confidence’

CGCC faculty members’ vote questions Dr. Frank Toda’s leadership ability

DR. FRANK Toda, CGCC president, left, leads Rep. Walden on a tour of the college work readiness center.

Raelynn Ricarte, The Dalles Chronicle
DR. FRANK Toda, CGCC president, left, leads Rep. Walden on a tour of the college work readiness center.

Department chairs and other faculty members of Columbia Gorge Community College have given a “no confidence” vote to the college’s president, Dr. Frank Toda, calling into question his ability to govern the college.

A letter was sent to the News anonymously, with the text of a resolution that faculty voted on, declaring that the “Instructional Council of CGCC has no confidence in the ability of Frank Toda to lead CGCC as an independently accredited academic institution of higher learning.”

The document contains language that accuses the 12-year president of “ignoring the cooperative decision-making processes that are the hallmark of collegiality more and more frequently for the past several years, particularly in personnel decisions for middle- and high-level administrative positions in both hiring and firing.”

The document’s legitimacy was confirmed by Tim Schell, Chair of the Writing, Literature, and Foreign Language Department as well as Science Department Chair Dan Ropek.

The resolution, which was crafted by department chairs, also states that “processes (Toda) has used are far less rigorous than the college’s standard processes for hiring faculty or classified staff, standards which should be the minimum for the hiring of the people that supervise those employees.”

The nine department chairs who make up a majority of the 13-member Instructional Council voted unanimously on Aug. 7 to approve the resolution outlining the chairs’ reasons for their lack of confidence in Toda. During a fall in-service meeting Sept. 21, other faculty members voted on the same resolution, with 40 voting no confidence, eight voting against no confidence, and 24 abstaining. Schell admitted that not every faculty member was present for the vote, but that “most of them” were.

Schell said the no confidence vote “sends a strong message that faculty is underrepresented” at CGCC. In the past, no confidence votes at other colleges have led to the removal of presidents.

When asked for a statement regarding the no confidence vote, Toda chose to say little about the matter.

“It is unfortunate that the faculty feel this way,” Toda said in a written statement. “The board chair will be responding on behalf of the college.”

Board Chair Dave Fenwick, who is one of six people who serve on the college board, issued the following statement:

“I’m very pleased that our faculty is so passionate about the organization of the college and the selection of the new manager of their supervisors,” Fenwick said in a written statement. “Of course, the president must consider the success of the college as a whole, and has procedures and policies in place to meet the objectives set by the community representatives on the college board. The president has received advice and recommendations from multiple sources, including the faculty chairs, and made a decision in the best interest of the entire college. In this case, the faculty chairs’ most recent suggestion was considered, but not implemented.”

Schell said that specifically, many faculty members were irked by a decision Toda made in July to combine the jobs of Chief Academic Officer and Chief of Student Services Officer into one position after the previous CAO left the job. He explained that the CAO essentially functions as the dean of faculty while the CSSO functions as the dean of students and that melding the two jobs into one was “terribly inadvisable because these two positions are in conflict with each other.”

Moreover, Schell said during a July 17 meeting with Toda, faculty requested the president conduct “a national search” for a new CAO and that the candidate be “someone with extensive classroom experience.” He noted that while Toda “acknowledged our concerns,” he announced on July 31 that he decided to promote the current CSSO, Lori Ufford, and combine the two positions.

Schell clarified that “none of us are at odds with Lori. We all respect her,” but that Toda neglected to do his due diligence during the hiring process and cast a wide net to seek out the best candidate for the job. He added that Toda has also chosen to not take staff recommendations regarding the CAO position in the past and that the no confidence vote “has been years in the making and has nothing to do with (Toda’s) 30-percent raise in June (bringing his salary to $175,000 per year), nor does it have anything to do with his promotion of his friend, (Chief Operating Officer) Robb Van Cleave.”

Six of the nine department chairs attended a college board meeting Aug. 13, a week after the initial no confidence vote, to air their concerns regarding the merger of the CAO and CSSO positions. According to Schell, the board, which he said has the power to remove the president of the institution, listened to the complaints, but took no action. He noted, however, that the chairs didn’t mention the no confidence vote at the time, “because we thought we could keep this from going public. We thought the board would do something, but they didn’t.”

Going public with the information wasn’t easy, though, as Schell noted that “many people were afraid to vote,” during the Sept. 21 in-service meeting, which resulted in the high number of abstentions. He explained that faculty members are not tenured at CGCC and that their contracts are brought up for renewal every year.

In the world of academia, Ropek said the removal of the president is typically “the implied tradition” behind a no confidence vote, but not all faculty members want the president ousted. According to Ropek, the vote represents a unified declaration of displeasure from the faculty towards Toda for not implementing a “process to allow (the CAO) to be vetted by the faculty,” as opposed to an appeal for the president’s removal.

Though Ropek said it’s technically “not required” that Toda go through that process, he also said that’s not the point.

“(Toda) may have the power to do it, and he obviously does,” Ropek explained, “but the question is: Is it wise?”


CGCC district comprises both Hood River and Wasco counties with the exception of Cascade Locks.

The college maintains campuses in The Dalles and on the Heights in Hood River.

Latest stories

Latest video:

Parkdale third graders sing "12 Disaster Days of Christmas"

Welcome to your sing-able Christmas gift list. What follows is an emergency rendition of “12 Days of Christmas” – for outfitting your home or car in case of snow storm, earthquake, flood or other emergency. Read it as a simple list, or sing it to the tune of “12 Days” – you know, as in “ … and a partridge in a pear tree…” Not to make light of it, but the song is a familiar framework for a set of gift ideas that you could consider gathering together, even if the recipient already owns items such as a bunch of coats, tire chains and flashlights. Stores throughout the Gorge are stocked up on all these items. Buying all 12 days might be prohibitive, but here are three ideas for checking any of the dozen off your list (notations follow, 1-12.) The gift items needed to stay warm, dry and safe are also coded to suggest items in your abode (A) in your car (C) or both (B). 12 Gallons of Water (A) 11 Family meals (B) 10 Cans of propane (A) 9 Hygiene bags (B) 8 Packs of batteries (A) 7 Spare coats (B) 6 Bright red flares (C) 5 Cozy blankets (B) 4 Tire chains (C) 3 Flashlights (B) 2 cell phone chargers (B) 1 And a crush-proof first aid kit (B) Price ranges? Here’s a few quotes for days Three, Two, Four and Nine: n A family gift of flashlights (three will run $15-30, Hood River Supply, Tum-A-Lum) n Cell phone chargers (two will run $30-60) n Tire chains (basic set, $30, Les Schwab, returnable if unused for the winter) n Family meals ($100 or so should cover the basics for three or four reasonably well-fed days) n The home kit should be kept in a handy place near an exit, and remember that water needs to be replenished every few months. If you have a solid first aid kit already, switch out the gift idea with “and-a-sto-o-u-t- tub-for it-all …” Otherwise, it’s a case of assembling your home or car kits and making sure all members of the family know what the resources are and how to use them (ie flares and propane). Emergency situations are at worst life-threatening, at best deeply uncomfortable if you and your family are left without power for an extended period, or traveling and find yourself in a situation where you need to wait out a storm, lengthy traffic delay, or other crisis. Notes on the 12 gift ideas: 12 – Gallons of water: that’s one per person in a four-member family to last for three days, the recommended minimum to be prepared for utility outages. 11 – Easy-open packaged goods, energy bars, dried food and nuts are good things to include for nutrition. Think of what your family of four needs for three days to stay fortified and hydrated (see number 12). Can-opener also recommended 10 – If you have a propane camping stove, keep extra fuel handy. 9 – Hygiene bags: put packaged moistened towelettes, toilet paper, and plastic ties in large garbage bags (for personal sanitation) Resource list courtesy of Hood River County Emergency Management, Barbara Ayers, manager/ 541-386-1213. The county also reminds residents to Get a Kit, Make A Plan to connect your family if separated, and Stay Informed. See www.co.hood-river.or.us to opt-in for citizen alerts. Enlarge

Log in to comment

News from our Community Partners